Which is better - "Duster" or "Hover": review, specifications, comparison

2024 Author: Erin Ralphs | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-02-19 11:42

When trying to figure out the superiority of the Chinese "Hover" or "Duster" from Europe, one should remember that the "Great Wall" is a serious SUV with a frame structure. At the same time, the French Renault is included in the category of standard crossovers with a conventional body. In terms of other parameters, it is not difficult to compare cars, since they are very similar in terms of technical indicators and equipment. Here the main thing for each consumer is to understand what he wants to see in a particular model for himself.

Used Motors

How is the “Hover” or “Duster” better to choose in terms of the parameters of the power unit? To understand this, you should consider the proposed line of "engines" from both manufacturers. Depending on the configuration, the Chinese SUV can be equipped with the following powertrains:

1. For the H3 series, a two-liter engine with a capacity of 115 horsepower is provided. With the installation of the turbine, the power increases to 150 "horses".
2. The rest of the versions are designed for the H5 modification. The first of them is 4G69S (the volume is 2.4 liters, the number of horses is 127, the fuel isgasoline).
3. GW4D2 2 liter diesel engine, 143 hp

The Renault crossover can also be equipped with three power units:

1. H4M 1.6L petrol engine (114 hp).
2. A two-liter analogue of the F4R with a power of 143 "horses" on gasoline.
3. 1.5L 109hp diesel engine

Efficiency and environmental friendliness of engines

Next, we will compare the "Duster" and "Hover" in terms of "appetites" and technical parameters of the motors. For example, Great Wall with a two-liter diesel "engine" "eats" when changing modes of movement of the order of 9.2 liters of diesel fuel. For comparison, a diesel "Frenchman" at 1.5 liters consumes only 5.3 liters.

The situation is similar for petrol units. Renault turns out to be more economical in terms of “appetites”. It consumes almost two times less gasoline than its "Asian" counterpart (7.8 liters and 13.7 liters per 100 km, respectively). Such indicators are often associated with the relatively low price of fuel in China, which allows the manufacturer not to worry too much about efficiency.

In terms of the emission of harmful substances into the environment, the Hover H5 is also inferior to the "European". If Duster meets the Euro-5 environmental friendliness parameter, then the Asian hardly fits into the Euro-4 standards. Given the increased interest of users in clean air, the superiority of the "Frenchman" at this stage is obvious.

Diesel or petrol?

The Hover diesel is more powerful than the French SUV, but consumes much more fuel. Besides,the diesel "engine" of the "Duster" was modernized by installing a turbine with a modified geometric configuration. This did not reduce the consumption of diesel fuel, but it allowed to increase the power by 19 horsepower. Renault gasoline ICEs consume less gasoline, which is achieved through an improved timing with a modified operating phase. It is worth emphasizing that the French manufacturer pays special attention to the efficiency of "engines" and the purity of exhaust gases.

Transmission

The review of "Hover" and "Duster" will continue in terms of the transmission unit. The Chinese SUV in all versions is equipped with a five-mode manual transmission, which aggregates with a 4x4 wheel arrangement. The exception is the diesel variant, which also comes with a six-speed manual or five-speed automatic transmission. An electromagnetic clutch is used to connect the second bridge. If necessary, rear-wheel drive can be activated mechanically using a convenient key.

The transmission design of the French SUV resembles an Asian device. Many users prefer this particular version, although it lacks a convenient rear clutch button. For this purpose, a special lever is provided, which is not surprising, since the crossover is represented by a 2x4 version with a front drive axle. If you don't plan to go through swamps and quicksands, this option is fine, since four-wheel drive is not so important.

Checkpoint features

Many are interested in the question of whether the "Hover" or "Duster" have the bestfunctionality and information content of the gearbox? Five and six-range mechanical boxes in the "European" crossover are quite comfortable and of high quality. This cannot be said about the four-mode automatic analogue. At the moment, Renault does not have a good enough "automatic". There is information that the designers of the French concern are going to update the line in the near future. It is worth noting that the mechanics of the car is configured so that the start from a place in the city is carried out from the second gear, and when overcoming rough terrain, the first reduced speed comes to the rescue.

A similar principle of operation is also incorporated in the Hover H5 transmission. Although so far the “Asian” has the best position in terms of automatic transmission. The reliability of this node gives the car an additional plus, however, the upcoming restyling of the “European” can change everything. Gasoline versions of the GW are equipped with "mechanics", and with good performance.

Travel elements

Let's try to figure out what is better - "Duster" or "Hover" in terms of "hodovka"? Both machines are equipped with independent torsion bars on the suspension block, focused on paved roads. Their design scheme is designed according to the MacPherson type. The French SUV has an independent assembly on the rear axle, while the Hover has dependent elements with spring shock absorbers and a stabilizer placed transversely. This arrangement improves the off-road patency of the car.

H5 is more confident on rough terrain, although it has a moderate roadclearance. This is due to the fact that the declared clearance of 240 millimeters is not maintained in practice, since the measurements of the parameter were initially carried out incorrectly. Chinese designers take into account the size of the pallet, if this dimension is taken from the "mudguard", it turns out only 190 mm. The "Duster" maintains the declared characteristic of 21 centimeters.

Steering

Both SUVs feature a classic rack and pinion steering column system. The difference is expressed in the fact that the "Frenchman" has an electronic amplifier. This design allows you to reduce fuel consumption, since the pressure in the hydraulic mechanism is pumped using a separate electric motor, which is significantly more profitable than that of an opponent. The Chinese hydraulic booster works by means of a belt drive. It aggregates with the crankshaft of the power unit. In comparative terms, the second option is somewhat worse.

Interior equipment

Let's try to find out if the Hover or Duster interior is better. At first glance, one gets the impression that both manufacturers have decided to save on the interior. There are no expensive finishes and artsy elements in the interior decoration. Nevertheless, the interiors are equipped with all the necessary details to ensure a comfortable driving experience without distracting accessories. Inside, everything is simple and cheap, but made practical and smart.

Regarding the trunk, it can be noted that here the Chinese SUV wins significantly. The volume of the compartment is 810 liters, and with the rear row of seats removed - 2074 liters. AtFrench crossover, these parameters are more modest - 476 and 1636 liters, respectively. The comparative advantage of "Asian" in this aspect is obvious.

Dimensions and equipment

Overall dimensions of the "Hover" / "Duster" (mm): length - 4650/4315, width - 1800/1625, height - 1900/1822. Manufacturers of the Chinese SUV decided to save on metal by depriving the car of the towbar. You will have to buy and install it yourself if necessary. Renault equips its crossover with this element as standard, which gives the car some advantage.

The vehicle from China has one more difference. The H3 version is considered the basis for the updated H5 version, which belongs to the "luxury" configuration. Here the owner receives a lot of useful options in standard equipment. Among them:

• climate control;
• ABS system;
• leather interior;
• heated seats and mirrors.

Taking into account the equipment of this version, its price is an order of magnitude higher than its predecessor. It is worth noting that Renault in the "luxury" version is not inferior to its competitor, although many users consider some elements of the "stuffing" to be superfluous, only increasing the cost of the vehicle.

Conclusions

Having studied the technical characteristics of the "Hover" and "Duster", we can conclude that both cars are worthy representatives of their segment. Both one and the other machine, with proper maintenance, works reliably and confidently. If for youfuel economy plays a fundamental role, definitely choose a French crossover. If you prefer the spaciousness of the cabin, trunk, as well as power, the model from Chinese manufacturers has an advantage here.